Penn St ex-coach, others charged in child sex case

RoyalGopher

Active member
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Kind of ugly situation in State College....

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ap-pennstateex-coach-allegations

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (AP)—A former defensive coach who was integral for decades to Penn State’s football success was accused Saturday of molesting eight boys, and two school administrators were charged with failing to tell police when a witness told them he saw a boy being sexually assaulted in the shower.

Former defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky, 67, was arrested Saturday and released on $100,000 bail after being arraigned on 40 criminal counts, according to the office of the state attorney general, Linda Kelly. She called Sandusky “a sexual predator who used his position within the university and community to repeatedly prey on young boys.”


This undated photo provided by the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General shows Jerry Sandusky, who was arrested on charges that he sexually abused eight young men.
(AP)
Though reports surfaced months ago that Sandusky was being investigated, the case took on an added dimension Saturday when Penn State’s athletic director, Tim Curley, 57, and vice president for finance and business Gary Schultz, 62, were charged with perjury. Both were expected to turn themselves in on Monday in Harrisburg.


Longtime head coach Joe Paterno, who has more victories than any coach in the history of Division I football, was not charged, authorities said, and the grand jury report did not appear to implicate him in wrongdoing. It said that when Paterno first learned of one report of abuse, he immediately reported it to Curley, but Sandusky was no longer coaching at the time and it’s not clear whether Paterno followed up with Curley.

For Penn State and the large community of alumni that surrounds it in Pennsylvania and beyond, the allegations represent a devastating blemish. Led for more than four decades by Paterno’s strong and unique public persona, the athletic program has prided itself on being clean and unsusceptible to the scandals that have tarnished other major schools.

Sandusky, closely identified with the school’s reputation as a defensive powerhouse and a program that produced top-quality linebackers, retired in 1999 but continued to work with at-risk children through the nonprofit Second Mile organization he founded in 1977, where authorities say all of the accusers first encountered him.

The allegations against Sandusky range from sexual touching to oral and anal sex, and the young men testified they were in their early teens when some of the abuse occurred, and there is evidence even younger children may have been victimized. Defense attorney Joe Amendola said Sandusky has been aware of the accusations for about three years and has maintained his innocence.

“He’s shaky, as you can expect,” Amendola told WJAC-TV after Sandusky was arraigned. “Being 67 years old, never having faced criminal charges in his life, and having the distinguished career that he’s had, these are very serious allegations.”

A preliminary hearing scheduled for Wednesday would likely be delayed, Amendola added. Sandusky is charged with multiple counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, corruption of minors, endangering the welfare of a child, indecent assault and unlawful contact with a minor, as well as single counts of aggravated indecent assault and attempted indecent assault.

No one answered a knock at the door Saturday at Sandusky’s modest, two-story brick home at the end of a dead-end road in State College. A man who answered the door at The Second Mile office in State College declined to give his name and said the organization had no comment.

The grand jury said eight boys were targets of sexual advances or assaults by Sandusky from 1994 to 2009. None was named, and in at least one case, the jury said the child’s identity remains unknown to authorities.

One accuser, now 27, testified that Sandusky initiated contact with a “soap battle” in the shower that led to multiple instances of involuntary sexual intercourse and indecent assault at Sandusky’s hands, the grand jury report said.

He said he traveled to charity functions and Penn State games with Sandusky, even being listed as a member of the Sandusky family party for the 1998 Outback Bowl and 1999 Alamo Bowl. But when the boy resisted his advances, Sandusky threatened to send him home from the Alamo Bowl, the report said.

Sandusky also gave him clothes, shoes, a snowboard, golf clubs, hockey gear and football jerseys, and even guaranteed that he could walk on to the football team, the jury said, and the boy also appeared with Sandusky in a photo in Sports Illustrated. He testified that Sandusky once gave him $50 to buy marijuana, drove him to purchase it, and then drove him home as the boy smoked the drug.


When Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno (right) first learned of one report of Jerry Sandusky's abuse he immediately reported it to the school's athletic director, prosecutors said.
(AP)
The first case to come to light was a boy who met Sandusky when he was 11 or 12, the grand jury said. The boy received expensive gifts and trips to sports events from Sandusky, and physical contact began during his overnight stays at Sandusky’s home, jurors said. Eventually, the boy’s mother reported the allegations of sexual assault to his high school, and Sandusky was banned from the child’s school district in Clinton County in 2009. That triggered the state investigation that culminated in charges Saturday.

But the report also alleges much earlier instances of abuse, and details failed efforts to stop it by some who became aware of what was happening.

Another child, known only as a boy about 11 to 13, was seen by a janitor pinned against a wall while Sandusky performed oral sex on him in fall 2000, the jury said.

And in 2002, Kelly said, a graduate assistant saw Sandusky sexually assault a naked boy, estimated to be about 10 years old, in a team locker room. The grad student and his father reported what he saw to Paterno, who immediately told Curley, prosecutors said.

Curley and Schultz met with the graduate assistant about a week and a half later, Kelly said.

“Despite a powerful eyewitness statement about the sexual assault of a child, this incident was not reported to any law enforcement or child protective agency, as required by Pennsylvania law,” Kelly said.

There’s no indication that anyone at school attempted to find the boy, or follow up with the witness, she said.

Curley denied that the assistant had reported anything of a sexual nature, calling it “merely `horsing around,”’ the 23-page grand jury report said. But he also testified that he barred Sandusky from bringing children onto campus and that he advised Penn State president Graham Spanier of the matter.

The jury said Curley was lying, Kelly said, adding that it also deemed portions of Schultz’s testimony not to be credible.

Schultz told the jurors he also knew of a 1998 investigation involving sexually inappropriate behavior by Sandusky with a boy in the showers the football team used.

But despite his job overseeing campus police, he never reported the 2002 allegations to any authorities, “never sought or received a police report on the 1998 incident and never attempted to learn the identity of the child in the shower in 2002,” the jurors wrote. “No one from the university did so.”

Lawyers for both Curley and Schultz issued statements saying they are innocent of all charges.

In response to a request for comment from Paterno, a spokesman for the athletic department said all such questions would be referred to university representatives, who released a statement from Spanier calling the allegations against Sandusky “troubling” and adding Curley and Schultz had his unconditional support.

He predicted they will be exonerated.

“I have known and worked daily with Tim and Gary for more than 16 years,” Spanier said. “I have complete confidence in how they handled the allegations about a former university employee.”

Sandusky, once considered a potential successor to Paterno, drew up the defenses for the Nittany Lions’ national-title teams in 1982 and 1986. The team is enjoying another successful run this season; at 8-1, Penn State is ranked No. 16 in the AP Top 25 and is the last undefeated squad in Big Ten play. The Nittany Lions were off Saturday.

As the head football coach, Paterno has spent years cultivating a reputation for putting integrity ahead of modern college-sports economics. It’s a notion that has benefited Penn State’s marketing and recruiting efforts over the decades and one that the Big Ten school’s alumni proudly tout years after they leave the campus known popularly as “Happy Valley.”

“We’re supposed to be one of the universities to follow after, someone to look up to,” said sophomore Brian Prewitt of Poughkeepsie, N.Y. “Now that people on the top are involved, it’s going to be bad.”

Scolforo reported from Harrisburg.
 


Yikes ... Not trying to nit-pick here ... but just so we are all clear it's State College not College Station. Either way ... wow.
 


It's so sad and sick. It will be very interesting to see how Penn State deals with this. A huge legal swamp for Penn State...
 



Stunned as soon as I heard this......by far the worst story of the day in sports.
 

If this story is true this guy should be euthanized. The administrators should be placed on suspension immediately and fired ASAP. No way Joe Pa comes back next year. The reporter was right in not giving him a free pass. This is way, way uglier than the UAB minor sex scandal from a few years back.
 




If this story is true this guy should be euthanized. The administrators should be placed on suspension immediately and fired ASAP. No way Joe Pa comes back next year. The reporter was right in not giving him a free pass. This is way, way uglier than the UAB minor sex scandal from a few years back.

Not saying you are right or wrong about Joe Pa, but why do you say no way he comes back? I read... well, skimmed, the article, it sounded like he reported it as soon as he heard about it. I am not saying I agree with you, but definately don't disagree with you. I would be just curious to hear you expand on that.
 

JoePa is not completly clean because the law requires the reporting of such incidents to the police. He did however report it to his AD who should have reported it on. I get the implication that JoePa reported the incident accurately, and said so to the Grand Jury, the AD tied to minimize what he knew and gets charged with perjury. Who are you going to believe JoePa or the AD?
 


Not saying you are right or wrong about Joe Pa, but why do you say no way he comes back? I read... well, skimmed, the article, it sounded like he reported it as soon as he heard about it. I am not saying I agree with you, but definately don't disagree with you. I would be just curious to hear you expand on that.

He reported it but it wasn't reported to the right people. Issue number one is why he waited a day to contact his boss about hearing an eyewitness report that a young boy was raped by an old man in a shower at your facility. Sounds to me like a situation that should get dealt with a bit more urgency. Issue number two is why it all stopped in the offices of the AD and the president. Like Wetzel points out in his article it they clearly thought it was serious enough to ban Sandusky from bringing kids onto campus. Why wasn't it serious enough to report it to authorities?

More than just the AD and associate president need to be called on to the carpet for this. The public deserves to hear explanations from both Paterno and the school president as to why they allowed these extremely disturbing allegations to go unreported to authorities. If their explanations are inadequate they should both be removed from their jobs immediately.
 



JoePa is not completly clean because the law requires the reporting of such incidents to the police. He did however report it to his AD who should have reported it on. I get the implication that JoePa reported the incident accurately, and said so to the Grand Jury, the AD tied to minimize what he knew and gets charged with perjury. Who are you going to believe JoePa or the AD?
It appears as though the law requires his supervisors to report it and that he did the correct thing by reporting to them (and not to the police). Try this post from Black Shoe Diaries for details.
http://www.blackshoediaries.com/201...oe-paterno-have-done-more-to-protect-children
 

This article gives a little better explination of the time line http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11309/1187869-150-0.stm. It appears that JoePa immediately called the AD and then followed up with a face to face meeting. It also should be noted that at the time of the incident that Sandusky was retired and not under JoePa's dirrect control. I suggest that we wait a bit and see what else plays out.
 

Sandusky still used Joe Paterno's program and facilities to aid in his behavior. This is really bad, and what is really poor are the immediate attempts to scrub this from Paterno's legacy. Who knows how long Paterno knew about Sandusky, look at the initial incident being reported and his retirement date, and Paterno only becomes aware after the third incident reported to have happened in his facility four years later? The grand jury report is online.

Bottom line, Paterno allowed Sandusky to use his facilities with 8-14 year old kids until he reported an incident reported by a distraught grad assistant of a young boy being sodomized in a shower in his locker room. There were other witnessed events in his facility prior to 2002. Paterno also knew that Sandusky continued to have his program for lost boys afterwards. I don't think another coach in the country skates from this.

Bottom line, Paterno legacy tainted.
Verdict: PSU football program sentenced to eternal irrelevance experienced by PSU basketball program. Paterno forced into retirement and Bobby Bowden returns to coaching West Virginia and passes Paterno's win record in boarder battle in Happy Valley.
 

This is quite horrible. I am a PSU alum and fan (Gophers first), and this hits right in the gut.

Something quite interesting and related to football on the matter - I'm going to guess that, with allegations and an investigation into related actions in 1998, this led directly to Paterno leaning towards Sandusky to retire in 1999. Remember, Sandusky was only 55 at the time, was a possible heir-apparent to Paterno, and was very upset at Paterno's decision.

A large complication of this matter is that Sandusky was not officially employed by Penn State after 1999, and was not part of Paterno's staff. Thus, Paterno was not in charge of Sandusky during the later allegations; on the other hand, some of the facilities being used in these instances were Penn State facilities, particularly football and sports buildings. I would imagine that it would be AD Tim Curley's and President Graham Spanier's ultimate responsibilities to ensure that these activities were not occurring in Penn State athletic buildings.

This whole situation is terrible.
 

"A large complication of this matter is that Sandusky was not officially employed by Penn State after 1999, and was not part of Paterno's staff. Thus, Paterno was not in charge of Sandusky during the later allegations; on the other hand, some of the facilities being used in these instances were Penn State facilities, particularly football and sports buildings. I would imagine that it would be AD Tim Curley's and President Graham Spanier's ultimate responsibilities to ensure that these activities were not occurring in Penn State athletic buildings."

If Paterno says he doesn't want a guy with these issues using his facilities, Sandusky isn't still using Joe's showers with little boys for 4 more years.
 





Thank you to the couple of guys who answered my questions. I was just confused how it went back to Joe Pa, because the initial article said he went directly to the AD. It would break my heart to see Joe Pa's career end due to something as sick of this.
 

Hearing the PSU lawyers explain why their clients had no legal obligation to report this to authorities is starting to make me even more angry about this case. Even if you didn't have a legal obligation to report this do you not have a moral obligation to call the authorities? A ten year old boy was witnessed being raped in one of your facilities and you don't report it because of a legal technicality? Even if it was only reported to the administration that it the two were horsing around in the shower and that Sandusky may have inappropriately grabbed his genitals it still undoubtedly should have been reported. For heavens sake they are trying to act like a sixty year old man engaging in a nude wrestling match in a shower with a ten year old boy isn't a big deal.

I hope the AD, school president, Paterno, and Mike McQueary (assuming he was the graduate assistant) all get sued and lose every penny they own. Unbelievable that they deemed protecting a former DC and the reputation of their football program more important than protecting children from a vicious sexual predator.
 

Thank you to the couple of guys who answered my questions. I was just confused how it went back to Joe Pa, because the initial article said he went directly to the AD. It would break my heart to see Joe Pa's career end due to something as sick of this.


The more I read and see people's opinions on this, it's not looking good. Joe Pa had a presser today to address it, but it was local media people who are PSU backers. Once the National guys go after it..... Can Joe Pa even answer those questions?
 

Hearing the PSU lawyers explain why their clients had no legal obligation to report this to authorities is starting to make me even more angry about this case. Even if you didn't have a legal obligation to report this do you not have a moral obligation to call the authorities? A ten year old boy was witnessed being raped in one of your facilities and you don't report it because of a legal technicality? Even if it was only reported to the administration that it the two were horsing around in the shower and that Sandusky may have inappropriately grabbed his genitals it still undoubtedly should have been reported. For heavens sake they are trying to act like a sixty year old man engaging in a nude wrestling match in a shower with a ten year old boy isn't a big deal.

I hope the AD, school president, Paterno, and Mike McQueary (assuming he was the graduate assistant) all get sued and lose every penny they own. Unbelievable that they deemed protecting a former DC and the reputation of their football program more important than protecting children from a vicious sexual predator.

If the reports are true, totally agree. Some folks did what the law required, but that doesn't fulfill their moral obligation to make sure this gets to the authorities. Can't imagine the damage this has done to those victims or how many additional victims there were because reputations came first.
 

I'm going out on a limb and predicting this is the end of Joe Paterno. Looks like the AD Curley is going to jail for perjury over this one. He is turning himself in to authorities. This is big.

Paterno is a dead man walking because tomorrow morning because this will be a national story, not a national sports story. Journalists who could care less about the lovable Joe Paterno and his legacy of winning and are more interested in finding out about a major institution covering for a pedophile using football facilities to lure in little boys. Paterno will have the Sid Hartmans of the media supporting him, but that won't be enough. The real journalists are going in for the kill and we are going to find out who knew and when. People need to remember Paterno was in his 60s and 70s when the sick stuff was going down and that should be the reference point.

The national media will also remember Paterno being the AD when Rene Portland was crusading against gay players on her team and operating a witch hunt to find out who was gay and running them out of college basketball. There will be people who aren't sports fans working this story.

What really blows me away is looking at an AD facing time. That is huge.
 

Hearing the PSU lawyers explain why their clients had no legal obligation to report this to authorities is starting to make me even more angry about this case. Even if you didn't have a legal obligation to report this do you not have a moral obligation to call the authorities? A ten year old boy was witnessed being raped in one of your facilities and you don't report it because of a legal technicality? Even if it was only reported to the administration that it the two were horsing around in the shower and that Sandusky may have inappropriately grabbed his genitals it still undoubtedly should have been reported. For heavens sake they are trying to act like a sixty year old man engaging in a nude wrestling match in a shower with a ten year old boy isn't a big deal.

I hope the AD, school president, Paterno, and Mike McQueary (assuming he was the graduate assistant) all get sued and lose every penny they own. Unbelievable that they deemed protecting a former DC and the reputation of their football program more important than protecting children from a vicious sexual predator.

First, until the facts come out, none of us know what happened with Joe Paterno. Did he turn a blind eye? Was he a curmudgeony old man who got ignored? To what extent was he informed of the details behind the situation? Further, remember that we have only heard one side of the story so far.

Second, there is a system of chain of command that NEEDS to be followed. Paterno followed it. Can you imagine if any Joe Blow went to the police over anything they feel like saying? Sally gets a smile in the hallway from Ugly Kid Joe. She finds UKJ to be ugly, and therefore is disgusted, and calls the police and informs them that UKJ touched her inappropriately. UKJ is smeared through the press for something he didn't do, and for the rest of his life, UKJ is deemed a sexual predator. Pretty unfair life for UKJ, wouldn't you say? Knowing what we all think we know now, we all wish Paterno, the GA, Curley, Spanier, or others would have done more. The key is..."knowing what we all think we know now."

For all we know, the GA (McQueary?) who witnessed the incident in 2002 was so taken aback that he didn't divulge full details of what he saw to any of his superiors. Some people have a difficult time believing the horrid things they see in life, especially things that confusing. It wouldn't be that surprising to learn that it wasn't until years later that the GA truly divulged the details of the horrors he witnessed. Again, WE are not the judge and jury, and it is therefore inappropriate to jump to any conclusions based on 23 horrific pages of reading, that leave out most of the details of the superiors involved. The American justice system, as flawed as it is, will eventually provide us with the appropriate answers.
 

Paterno speaks....

http://bwi.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1289577

See the AP article, as posted on the Penn State Rivals page.

He contends that he had never was told the full gory details of the 2002 incident. This would go along with what Curley and others had testified - that they hadn't heard the most serious details either. So is that the truth?

One must ask themself - if you are Paterno, or Tim Curley, or anyone else involved, and you heard explicit details from an eyewitness of a rape of a young boy occurring in the football locker room; how would you NOT act further? This is why I find it hard to believe that Paterno or others ever actually were told the full details by the GA. Their future actions, including allowing what would have to be deemed a disgusting man future access to campus facilities, do not seem to corroborate full knowledge of the situation.

That said, perhaps they should have pressed for more details, then...
 

Hearing the PSU lawyers explain why their clients had no legal obligation to report this to authorities is starting to make me even more angry about this case. Even if you didn't have a legal obligation to report this do you not have a moral obligation to call the authorities? A ten year old boy was witnessed being raped in one of your facilities and you don't report it because of a legal technicality? Even if it was only reported to the administration that it the two were horsing around in the shower and that Sandusky may have inappropriately grabbed his genitals it still undoubtedly should have been reported. For heavens sake they are trying to act like a sixty year old man engaging in a nude wrestling match in a shower with a ten year old boy isn't a big deal.

I hope the AD, school president, Paterno, and Mike McQueary (assuming he was the graduate assistant) all get sued and lose every penny they own. Unbelievable that they deemed protecting a former DC and the reputation of their football program more important than protecting children from a vicious sexual predator.

Have to agree with all of this. Paterno's involvement in this (or non-involvement) is just messed up. I'm also guessing this will be his last year.

I'm shocked to hear that it was Mike McQueary that was the Grad Assistant. Someone that is still obviously very involved in the program. Does anybody remember if Sandusky was around the program after this was reported in 2002? Or was that the end of the emeritus status and access to the football facilities, etc.?
 




Top Bottom