BREAKING: Coyle Hires Brett Larson as New Gophers Coach

Has nothing to do with supporting the team or coach so don’t insinuate that I don’t. It is about expecting people to be accountable and responsible for their job. If you don’t care or feel Coyle did a great job obviously that’s your right. Many people don’t and that will manifest itself in a bad way if the team has a bumpy year. Larson won’t get much slack from people who don’t even understand how he got the job. He has my support until he proves otherwise. Coyle has no credibility.
Yeah ultimately my gripe is with Coyle and how this was conducted, not Larson who I'm willing to keep an open mind about. Will be interesting to see what this conversation looks like in 2030 when Coyle's contract is up (assuming it doesn't get extended before then).

I do agree that he got a lot of his other hires right but now the issue seems to be getting those coaches the right resources to compete.
 

I disagree with your last sentence. Coyle hired Fleck, Medved, Plitzuweit, and Motzko. 4 damn good hires. He’s got plenty of credibility.
Johnson and Whalen were conveniently left off your list. Jury is still out Medved.
 

Johnson and Whalen were conveniently left off your list. Jury is still out Medved.
Medved was a home run hire. Whalen didn’t work out but that hire was lauded at the time. Overall Coyle has a good track record here and certainly has credibility.
 

I don't doubt that Coyle made many phone calls prior to the firing of the two hockey coaches. I also don't doubt that Coyle did much more work than people think. Due to the fact that he was prepared, felt out who was available, the process appeared not to take long from our seats.
 

As others have said, can we see if Larson turns out okay first? If he wins three nattys in 4 years, are we still going to be mad at Coyle? If the program has a few more seasons like this last one, then I'll really be upset with the process. Until then it does no good to keep bitching about it.
I hated the process but if we win 3 Nattys in 4 years i will shovel Coyle's driveway from now to eternity
 


For the Coyle apologists…is there any coach that wouldn’t have been a good hire?
 

I don't doubt that Coyle made many phone calls prior to the firing of the two hockey coaches. I also don't doubt that Coyle did much more work than people think. Due to the fact that he was prepared, felt out who was available, the process appeared not to take long from our seats.
That’s reassuring.
 


As others have said, can we see if Larson turns out okay first? If he wins three nattys in 4 years, are we still going to be mad at Coyle? If the program has a few more seasons like this last one, then I'll really be upset with the process. Until then it does no good to keep bitching about it.
Yeah I think those of us who aren't quite excited about this pick will happily eat crow if they raise that NCAA trophy.
 



That’s reassuring.
I feel so much better now! I agree with you. Coyle fired Frost for failure to advance the program only to hire his assistant? He parts ways with Motzko only to hire his replacement at SCSU who spent the last 3 years building a record that would have most of these people here on this board screaming for his head like they did with Bob. I don't care that Coyle may have made some calls before pulling the trigger, I care that apparently the right people didn't want to take his calls.
 

What's your point? NIL is not strong at the U, either. You are hiring a guy for a top five job in the country that has been under .500 the last two seasons. I don't care about all the frickin excuses.
Maybe the point should be that, regardless of who pays how much and how far away is your mommy, Minnesota kids should get back to bleeding maroon instead of red/green/blue. Moorhead kids seem to be able to handle it.
 

I disagree with your last sentence. Coyle hired Fleck, Medved, Plitzuweit, and Motzko. 4 damn good hires. He’s got plenty of credibility.
So of the four coaches put forward as his good hires, we include the coach who was just let go for poor replacement, his replacement (who has a less impressive resume than the guy we just let go), and a coach who has not qualified for a single NCAA tournament (im optimistic about Medved, but he has not yet produced results that would make me declare him a good hire yet)?

Dont forget Johnson, Whalen, Cook, and Piper Ritter. On the list of Coyle's hires, I dont see any I would label as unqualifably spectacular, 2 (Fleck and Dawn P) who i would not hesitate before calling good hired, and the rest are either disappointing, catastrophic, or too early to tell. Not a good overall success rate with his hires in my opinion (though ill acknowledge football is the biggest one, so he gets points for getting the most high stakes hire right).
 

So of the four coaches put forward as his good hires, we include the coach who was just let go for poor replacement, his replacement (who has a less impressive resume than the guy we just let go), and a coach who has not qualified for a single NCAA tournament (im optimistic about Medved, but he has not yet produced results that would make me declare him a good hire yet)?

Dont forget Johnson, Whalen, Cook, and Piper Ritter. On the list of Coyle's hires, I dont see any I would label as unqualifably spectacular, 2 (Fleck and Dawn P) who i would not hesitate before calling good hired, and the rest are either disappointing, catastrophic, or too early to tell. Not a good overall success rate with his hires in my opinion (though ill acknowledge football is the biggest one, so he gets points for getting the most high stakes hire right).
Coyle also renewed Eggum's contract as a reward for running the Wrestling program back to mediocrity.

We need to see what Larson can do but there's plenty to be concerned about in regards to Coyle as an AD. We haven't even started talking about his poor public appearances and inability to fundraise yet.

Like others have mentioned, we need to get some great results on the recruiting trail to stop focusing on the negatives of the recent hiring process.
 




Stretch it out well beyond that timeframe and it looks worse. Since Herb's last championship team in 1979, we've won 2 national championships in the last 47 years (46 tournaments), sandwiching our back-to-back titles in 2002 and 2003 between a pair of 22-year droughts. In the last 46 tournaments we've appeared in the title game just 6 times, or 13%. For a supposed hockey superpower with seemingly every resource available, that’s terrible.
Well said.
 

Where is this hunch coming from, though?
It’s coming from the fact he coached his team to a national championship in just his second season. He’s also been a part of 3 other national championship games. His successor at SCSU will do much worse. Larson will bring the long needed toughness to Minnesota.
 

I am curious:

1.) What are his relationships in Minnesota Hockey like?
2.) What is his relationship like with the Cullen family?
3.) Will he recruit well in he CHL, internationally and locally. Will

To me this hire is an interesting one. I understood bringing in Bob - he won big at SCSU. This moves seems to be driven by age, recruiting, something else. I don't know enough about the situation, but I am guessing there is more to this story then just hiring a middling coach.
He’s not a middling coach. You’ll see what happens at SCSU after he’s left. He’ll be the best Gopher coach since Lucia and Brooks.
 


He’s not a middling coach. You’ll see what happens at SCSU after he’s left. He’ll be the best Gopher coach since Lucia and Brooks.
Either he gets a title or he doesn't. That's how he'll be judged then. We'll see.
 

Larson and May should not plan on getting much sleep in the next year. They have an immense job ahead of them. I am not sure that the problems can be solved by hard work alone.
 



Yeah who knows, I doubt the U wanted to pay that buy out or could raise the kind of money needed to do that even if it is true.
 

Yeah who knows, I doubt the U wanted to pay that buy out or could raise the kind of money needed to do that even if it is true.
This part is the tough aspect given his buyout is crazy high. Only possible way is a huge money booster dumping dollars in

Additionally, “being interested” is wildly different than wanting the job
 



Regarding the buyout, is it really that big of a deal if the mens hockey team takes a loss for one year? It seems to be ok that every other program (besides FB and MBB) operates in the negative, why not take the hit on the buyout and lose money for one season when in the grand scheme of things having a top tier coach will likely bring in tons of revenue over a decade.
 

Regarding the buyout, is it really that big of a deal if the mens hockey team takes a loss for one year? It seems to be ok that every other program (besides FB and MBB) operates in the negative, why not take the hit on the buyout and lose money for one season when in the grand scheme of things having a top tier coach will likely bring in tons of revenue over a decade.
Don't ask the obvious questions about giving the hockey program what it needs and deserves
 

To be clear I'm not bashing the hire, but if Fersh is the better candidate and wants to be here I'd like to see some effort to get him hired.
 

Regarding the buyout, is it really that big of a deal if the mens hockey team takes a loss for one year? It seems to be ok that every other program (besides FB and MBB) operates in the negative, why not take the hit on the buyout and lose money for one season when in the grand scheme of things having a top tier coach will likely bring in tons of revenue over a decade.
The buyout of ~2 million is what, multiple years of the hockey team's profits? Coyle has never been good at fundraising either from what I gather so it probably wasn't realistic to think that was a real possibility.

Not saying this is ideal or anything just the reality of the situation. Unless something crazy happens this hire takes us to the end of Coyle's contract so it's in his best interest to get this right (assuming he doesn't bolt for some other job before then).
 




Top Bottom