gopherphil
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2021
- Messages
- 722
- Reaction score
- 813
- Points
- 93
I’m not sure you do eitherI’m not sure what you are talking about??
I’m not sure you do eitherI’m not sure what you are talking about??
If Wisconsin was 5-6 instead of 4-7 they call that IMO.That was a hell of a shot by Gousby....timed it perfectly and clean.
He hits him in the chest, thankfully. He easily could’ve just knocked it down and tempted fateNo call targeting makes up for the phantom td
I've lobbied for that to be in PJ's contract. $10 million, but you lose $1 million for every time out taken outside of 2:00 in either half. He'd coach for free.Does Fickell get a bonus for every timeout saved?
I’d have to consult the rule book but if they called conventional personal foul it wouldn’t have been a bad call. Dangerous. Glad they didn’t throw anything.That was a hell of a shot by Gousby....timed it perfectly and clean.
We had to snap it before 2:00 so it made sense or was a wash at worst.Need to use this break to get emotions under control because getting chippy.
Questionable clock management by Fickell.
Probably didn’t want to use it on 2nd and 2 but when you’re down two scores doesn’t make a whole of sense to not use the TO.Does Fickell get a bonus for every timeout saved?
He was below the shouldersLooked like targeting to me![]()
Trying to start an argument???Looked like targeting to me![]()
Or at any time on their last drive when the clock was bleeding.Probably didn’t want to use it on 2nd and 2 but when you’re down two scores doesn’t make a whole of sense to not use the TO.
Not just in that situation....down 2 scores and they were not going no huddle on offense and eating up a ton of clock.We had to snap it before 2:00 so it made sense or was a wash at worst.
That was bad yes.Not just in that situation....down 2 scores and they were not going no huddle on offense and eating up a ton of clock.
He was below the shoulders