die hard gopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 9,284
- Reaction score
- 880
- Points
- 113
I'm at 50-50, wouldn't be surprised either way.
I'm surprised people are insisting he needs to improve his outside shooting. Have people been watching? He IS already consistently knocking down the 15-foot jumper than the NBA loves its big men to hit. Like real consistently. That is why his stock is jumping now. He will never be much of a three-point threat, just enough that you have to keep the defender honest. His major point of development is footwork as he gets caught between steps and he travels a lot (more often than its called). The good news is that traveling is not a violation in the NBA.
This. He gone folks. He'll have a better draft this year than next year. Plus, he's ready. Sure everyone could use more development, but he can get that development while drawing a paycheck too.
I'm surprised people are insisting he needs to improve his outside shooting. Have people been watching? He IS already consistently knocking down the 15-foot jumper than the NBA loves its big men to hit. Like real consistently. That is why his stock is jumping now. He will never be much of a three-point threat, just enough that you have to keep the defender honest. His major point of development is footwork as he gets caught between steps and he travels a lot (more often than its called). The good news is that traveling is not a violation in the NBA.
Well said. The NBA doesn't value the college game development very highly. If you are good enough to get drafted in the first round, they would rather you continue that development in the NBA.
But short of that (Sweet 16), especially if Gophers don't even make the tournament, just a gut feeling that he'll want to play this thing out and stick around for a third (and final) season. He'd have it in his mind that the 2020-21 season would have a chance to be really special with all the talent they'd have returning, and presumably some help on the way (Mashburn at least). My vibe is team/program success & legacy matter to him. Not to mention he most definitely could improve his draft stock.
DeAndre Ayton was a #1 pick with no defense and no outside shot...I'm surprised people are insisting he needs to improve his outside shooting. Have people been watching? He IS already consistently knocking down the 15-foot jumper than the NBA loves its big men to hit. Like real consistently. That is why his stock is jumping now. He will never be much of a three-point threat, just enough that you have to keep the defender honest. His major point of development is footwork as he gets caught between steps and he travels a lot (more often than its called). The good news is that traveling is not a violation in the NBA.
It has so much potential because we're starting 3 Sophomores and a Freshman. I know this a strange concept but players do DEVELOP and get better over time.Boohoo. If this team has so much potential, how about winning at a high level THIS YEAR.
I think this is a key point, it can end up being a detriment to stick around
The #10 projection is awesome, but I haven't been able to find a single other mock draft with him even in the first round. Weird to see such a large disparity.
I think that the reason it that they draft players based upon their perceived potential. They can watch a younger player play and convince themselves that they have all kinds of upside. If that player hangs around in college for another year or two and doesn't improve enough then they start to wonder if they are near their ceiling.I'm puzzled why NBA teams still "punish" older players in the draft. They're not running backs who are using up their limited mileage. I'd rather have a under his rookie contract from age 22-27 than 20-25 all other things equal.
The #10 projection is awesome, but I haven't been able to find a single other mock draft with him even in the first round. Weird to see such a large disparity.
I'm puzzled why NBA teams still "punish" older players in the draft. They're not running backs who are using up their limited mileage. I'd rather have a under his rookie contract from age 22-27 than 20-25 all other things equal.
It is the same website that had Rodney Williams as the #3 pick after just a couple games his FR year.
I don't disagree, but it's foolishness. I'd rather have more information, not less. I'd rather have a guy who's a year stronger and more experienced. Unless he actually plays worse or is injured, he shouldn't decline in your assessment.I think that the reason it that they draft players based upon their perceived potential. They can watch a younger player play and convince themselves that they have all kinds of upside. If that player hangs around in college for another year or two and doesn't improve enough then they start to wonder if they are near their ceiling.
I get that logic for the top 5-10 guys. But in the back half of the 1st round, you're just trying to get a solid player.I think SKOOKM gave a pretty good explanation but I'll add the following:
I think their attitude often is "If you really are that good, you'd be in the NBA already" AND "the best players are freshmen and sophs so, if you're a senior, you have a two or three year age advantage on the better players so if you playing well against them, that doesn't mean as much." Sort of a Catch 22.
They do draft seniors - some of them in the first round - but mostly they tend to be 2nd rounders and undrafted free agents.