BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,757
- Reaction score
- 20,108
- Points
- 113
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Go Gophers!!
Go Gophers!!
I think most here thought this team could be 3rd in the B1G. We'll never know.
We were mistaken. They'd be 8-6 right now at best. Maybe 9-5 with Curry.
We were mistaken. They'd be 8-6 right now at best. Maybe 9-5 with Curry.
I thought we would be 3rd in the Conference this year. Based on how they played prior to everything falling apart I think 4th or 5th is more realistic simply because Nebraska and Ohio State are much better than I anticipated.
Oh really? So basically adding 3-4 of the Top 6 players back into the lineup would have STILL resulted in 6 conf losses?
Several paragraphs of excuses...
I want to discuss them in more detail.
I'll with Lynch/Coffey. Curry's been out the full time and no one can assume zero injuries.
Purdue: There's actually a better argument here since it was single digits in the second half. But Purdue is far better than us even at full strength and we lost by 34. Lo
@Maryland: We lost by 11. Harris and Fitzgerald scored 20 points. Coffey would have taken minutes from them, so it's not clear how much he swings it. Lynch makes a bigger difference. In a closer game, Home Cookin would have come into play. Toss-up.
@OSU: Lost by 18. Coffey played. Lynch doesn't make in 18 point difference. Loss.
@Iowa: Lost by 14. Hurt, Fitzgerald and Washington scored 38 points. Again, Coffey/Lynch would have taken some of their minutes. Toss-up.
Net: We win 4 games (IU, NW, @MI, NE) and split the toss-up (@MD, @IA). Instead of being 3-11, we're 8-6. We'd be squarely on the bubble, playing for our tournament lives against MSU on Tuesday. You can argue this maybe one game one way or the other, but that's it.
If, but , could, would, should. Near 50 years now, about thay for the Vikings too, i banned that kind of language a long time ago. I was raised to never whine or make excuses and raised my kids that way to great effect. Injuries have destroyed this year but it is a bold myth that no coach could have won a game or two more. Bo Ryan would be at least 500 in this weak conference with the uninjured or non suspended talent. Murph, Mason, Harris, Washington, Dupree . Harris and Hurt are more than enough to hold teams to under 60 and win.
...but you can not admit that there are coaches who would get this roster to .500 in conference. Of course by year 5 they would be so much further along.
My favorite part of how people react when a season falls apart: Suddenly it's impossible that the team would have improved over the course of the season had they stayed healthy. It's entirely possible that the players who continued to play would have improved. Not saying that they would have, but it's funny how so many people find it necessary to be negative.
Negativity breeds negativity.
Btw, for the University that invented cheerleading(and all of the first cheerleaders were men, basically), our fans kind of suck. And yes, I am inferring that THE FANS are supposed to act like cheerleaders, cheering for the home team no matter what!!! This program needs more fans who are willing to sit through some ugly games/seasons.
We want top notch coaches and players to come up here to the Frozen Tundra, to Cbb laughingstock U, and then heap upon them the same kind of expectations you might find at UNC or Duke or UCLA or UK???
This is friggin Minnesota, we need to become the fan base that sits through several ugly seasons in a row, through thick and thin, through rain and snow, that PROVES our dedication and loyalty to the program, before we deserve to have any of these supposed GREAT coaches or GREAT players coming up here to freeze their arses off.
We need recruits to come to games where we are getting blown away and see that despite how the team is doing, that we as a fanbase are doing all we can to support and inspire our team.
Just felt the last part needed to be posted separately
What about the expectations at UW or Butler or Xavier or UVA where they built excellence by hiring the right coaches. Is it ok to want that, Is it OK to want a great coach ? Sure they are hard to find but if you follow the lead on how Richter went about it, or Littlepage or Sterk instead of counting on Maturi or Teague and Villa 7. Villa 7 became a national joke to the network of retired successful , hall of fame coaches and in some cases players. Sterk asked Jerry West and Bob Knight who was the best of the young coaches getting in the game, Coach K verified it and paved the way. Earlier, that is how Matta got his start. It is hard, there are not many but great things take great minds and just like in any sport they must be vetted by the best of the best. We finally used that method in hiring Fleck. Football is even more difficult and time will tell but they went about it the right way. In Hoops a great coach can survive with three of his own players in a down year but every single one established lock down defense from day one, cut no corners on character. It is not Richards fault he was hired, great opportunity but the way he was settled on was pathetic and mismanaged by one truly horrible AD in a string of lousy AD's.
Xavier? What, they are FINALLY having a good year and you parade them out as if this is a regular occurance? Xavier doing this well is a very RARE occurance.
.
This alone shows astounding ignorance of college basketball. Is your name Jim by chance? Are you like, really, really fit?
Compared to the Gophers, sure, then they probably look incredible, but ZERO FFs???
Oh yeah, they made the E8 just last year, so what? You are young and can't remember how Xavier needed to 1987 just to get a single win in the NCAA tourney, and then needed another 18 years to get to their first Elite 8?
So is it my "ignorance of college basketball" or my knowing about more than the last 15 years???
And even when they did make the Elite 8 or Sweet 16 in the past, they rarely did so as a Top 8 or Top 16 ranked team.
I'm not dissing them, just its rare to see them ranked so high in the polls. 1 Elite 8 in the last 9 years does not make them a super cbb power. My guess is that they were not ranked in the Top 10 even once in the last decade.
You said Xavier was FINALLY having a good year, and them having a year this good is RARE. They've made 6 Sweet 16's in the last 10 years. Anyone who's not Duke/UNC/Kentucky would consider that a good year. Your comment is ignorant by any standard.
. ... Xavier? What, they are FINALLY having a good year and you parade them out as if this is a regular occurance? Xavier doing this well is a very RARE occurance.
You said Xavier was FINALLY having a good year, and them having a year this good is RARE. They've made 6 Sweet 16's in the last 10 years. Anyone who's not Duke/UNC/Kentucky would consider that a good year. Your comment is ignorant by any standard.
Ignorant is being kind. The guy is a rambling idiot